Consistent revenue streams over recent years, indicating operational stability.
Spending Breakdown
How The Seer School allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
75%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about The Seer School
Is The Seer School a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, The Seer School (EIN: 201473640) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 1 red flag identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is The Seer School a good charity to donate to?
The Seer School has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $182K. Assets: $45K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for The Seer School?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for The Seer School is 201473640. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does The Seer School spend its money?
The Seer School allocates 75% to programs, 15% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify The Seer School's tax-exempt status?
You can verify The Seer School's tax-exempt status using EIN 201473640 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Seer School demonstrates a consistent operational history with revenues fluctuating but generally stable over the past few years, peaking at $212,887 in 2017 and most recently reporting $181,657 in 2018. The organization's assets have shown growth, from $17,216 in 2012 to $44,595 in 2018, indicating some financial stability. Liabilities have remained relatively low, suggesting responsible financial management. A key strength is the reported 0% officer compensation across all available filings, which indicates a strong commitment to directing funds towards the mission rather than executive salaries. However, without a detailed breakdown of expenses (program, administrative, fundraising) from the provided data, a precise assessment of spending efficiency is challenging. The organization's financial health appears stable for its size, but further detail on expense allocation would enhance transparency.