Most recent filing (2023) shows a surplus of revenue over expenses
Spending Breakdown
How The Society For The Advancement Of Blood Management allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about The Society For The Advancement Of Blood Management
Is The Society For The Advancement Of Blood Management a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, The Society For The Advancement Of Blood Management (EIN: 201842126) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 2 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is The Society For The Advancement Of Blood Management a good charity to donate to?
The Society For The Advancement Of Blood Management has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $651K. Assets: $430K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for The Society For The Advancement Of Blood Management?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for The Society For The Advancement Of Blood Management is 201842126. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does The Society For The Advancement Of Blood Management spend its money?
The Society For The Advancement Of Blood Management allocates 85% to programs, 10% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify The Society For The Advancement Of Blood Management's tax-exempt status?
You can verify The Society For The Advancement Of Blood Management's tax-exempt status using EIN 201842126 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Society For The Advancement Of Blood Management demonstrates a generally stable financial position, with recent revenues of $686,348 in 2023 slightly exceeding expenses of $660,548, leading to a modest surplus. While assets have fluctuated over the years, from a high of $865,961 in 2015 to $412,577 in 2023, the organization maintains a positive asset-to-liability ratio, indicating solvency. The consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all available filings suggests a commitment to minimizing administrative overhead related to executive pay, which is a positive indicator for spending efficiency.
The organization's financial health appears sound, with revenues generally covering expenses, though there have been periods of deficit spending, such as in 2022 where expenses ($592,880) exceeded revenue ($477,956). The lack of detailed functional expense breakdowns (program, administrative, fundraising) in the provided data makes a precise assessment of spending efficiency challenging. However, the absence of reported officer compensation is a strong point for transparency and efficient use of funds.
Overall, the Society For The Advancement Of Blood Management appears to be a financially responsible organization, consistently filing its IRS 990s and demonstrating a commitment to its mission without incurring executive compensation costs. Further detailed expense breakdowns would enhance the transparency report, but the available data suggests prudent financial management.