In periods with reported expenses, a high percentage appears to be directed towards programs (estimated based on lack of fundraising/admin specific data).
Spending Breakdown
How The Stevens Home allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about The Stevens Home
Is The Stevens Home a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, The Stevens Home (EIN: 10220389) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 65/100. 3 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is The Stevens Home a good charity to donate to?
The Stevens Home has a Mission Score of 65/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for The Stevens Home?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for The Stevens Home is 10220389. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does The Stevens Home spend its money?
The Stevens Home allocates 90% to programs, 10% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify The Stevens Home's tax-exempt status?
You can verify The Stevens Home's tax-exempt status using EIN 10220389 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Stevens Home appears to be a very small organization, based in Brunswick, ME, with a fluctuating financial history. The most recent filing data indicates $0 in revenue and assets, which suggests either inactivity or a significant change in reporting. In prior years, revenue varied wildly, from $9,484 in 2015 to $225,625 in 2012. Expenses also showed significant variability, with a notable spike to $521,582 in 2013, far exceeding revenue for that period. The organization consistently reports very low liabilities and no officer compensation, which is a positive sign for transparency regarding executive pay. However, the lack of recent financial activity and the historical volatility raise questions about its ongoing operational status and long-term sustainability.