Very low reported expenses relative to asset size, raising questions about program scale and impact.
Strengths
Consistently low liabilities ($1 in recent years, $0 historically), indicating minimal debt.
No reported officer compensation, potentially maximizing funds for mission if programs are effective.
Spending Breakdown
How The Sublimity Life Foundation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
60%
Program Spending
Below average — room for improvement
30%
Admin Costs
High — over 25% on administration
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about The Sublimity Life Foundation
Is The Sublimity Life Foundation a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, The Sublimity Life Foundation (EIN: 205773400) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 45/100. 4 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is The Sublimity Life Foundation a good charity to donate to?
The Sublimity Life Foundation has a Mission Score of 45/100. Revenue: $221K. Assets: $232K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for The Sublimity Life Foundation?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for The Sublimity Life Foundation is 205773400. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does The Sublimity Life Foundation spend its money?
The Sublimity Life Foundation allocates 60% to programs, 30% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify The Sublimity Life Foundation's tax-exempt status?
You can verify The Sublimity Life Foundation's tax-exempt status using EIN 205773400 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Sublimity Life Foundation exhibits a concerning financial trend with inconsistent revenue generation and a pattern of expenses often exceeding revenue in recent years. For instance, in 2023, revenue was $2,566 against expenses of $2,656, and in 2022, the organization reported negative revenue of $-31,584 while incurring $4,187 in expenses. This suggests a reliance on existing assets rather than sustainable fundraising or program income. The organization's assets have also shown a significant decline from a high of $320,570 in 2020 to $220,561 in 2023, indicating a draw-down of reserves.
Spending efficiency is difficult to assess without a detailed breakdown of expenses into program, administrative, and fundraising categories, which is not provided in the summary data. However, the consistently low expense figures (e.g., $2,656 in 2023) for an organization with over $200,000 in assets raise questions about the scale and impact of its programs. The lack of reported officer compensation across all filings suggests either a fully volunteer-run operation or that compensation is structured in a way not captured by this specific data point, which could be a positive for efficiency or a point of inquiry for transparency.
Overall, while the organization maintains a minimal liability profile, its financial health appears precarious due to volatile and often insufficient revenue streams relative to its operational costs and asset base. Greater transparency regarding program activities and a more detailed expense breakdown would be beneficial for a comprehensive assessment.