Quick charity verification for The Techlinc Project (EIN: 134358769)
Verdict: The Techlinc Project shows mixed signals
60/100Mission Score
$0Revenue
$0Assets
2Red Flags
2Strengths
Red Flags
Minimal assets ($1 in 2020) indicating no financial reserves
Zero latest reported revenue and assets, suggesting potential inactivity or very recent formation beyond the 2020 filing
Strengths
100% of expenses ($16,200 in 2020) allocated to programs, indicating strong program focus
No reported officer compensation in 2020, suggesting volunteer leadership or highly efficient use of funds
Spending Breakdown
How The Techlinc Project allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
100%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
0%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about The Techlinc Project
Is The Techlinc Project a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, The Techlinc Project (EIN: 134358769) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 60/100. 2 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is The Techlinc Project a good charity to donate to?
The Techlinc Project has a Mission Score of 60/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for The Techlinc Project?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for The Techlinc Project is 134358769. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does The Techlinc Project spend its money?
The Techlinc Project allocates 100% to programs, 0% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify The Techlinc Project's tax-exempt status?
You can verify The Techlinc Project's tax-exempt status using EIN 134358769 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Techlinc Project appears to be a very small, nascent organization based on its single IRS 990 filing for the period ending December 2020. With total revenue of $16,200 and expenses matching at $16,200, the organization operated at a break-even point. Its assets were reported as a nominal $1, indicating minimal financial reserves or infrastructure. The lack of reported officer compensation suggests either a fully volunteer-run operation or that compensation was below reporting thresholds for this initial period. Given the limited financial activity and single filing, a comprehensive assessment of financial health, spending efficiency, and transparency is challenging, but the organization is transparent in its initial filing.