Long history of IRS 990 filings (9 filings), indicating transparency and compliance.
Spending Breakdown
How Tim And Mary Haddon Family Foundation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
8%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
2%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Tim And Mary Haddon Family Foundation
Is Tim And Mary Haddon Family Foundation a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Tim And Mary Haddon Family Foundation (EIN: 203758042) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 65/100. 2 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Tim And Mary Haddon Family Foundation a good charity to donate to?
Tim And Mary Haddon Family Foundation has a Mission Score of 65/100. Revenue: $311K. Assets: $140K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Tim And Mary Haddon Family Foundation?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Tim And Mary Haddon Family Foundation is 203758042. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Tim And Mary Haddon Family Foundation spend its money?
Tim And Mary Haddon Family Foundation allocates 90% to programs, 8% to administration, and 2% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Tim And Mary Haddon Family Foundation's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Tim And Mary Haddon Family Foundation's tax-exempt status using EIN 203758042 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Tim And Mary Haddon Family Foundation appears to be a private foundation, as indicated by its consistent negative net revenue in recent years and declining asset base, typical of foundations making grants from an endowment. Its financial health shows a concerning trend of declining assets, from a peak of $729,899 in 2011 to $140,479 in 2022. This suggests that the foundation is spending down its principal faster than it is generating new revenue. For example, in 2022, the foundation reported a negative revenue of $-10,463 while incurring expenses of $100,113.
Regarding spending efficiency, without a detailed breakdown of expenses into program, administrative, and fundraising categories, it's challenging to fully assess. However, as a private foundation, a significant portion of its expenses would typically be grants made to other organizations, which are considered program spending. The consistent liabilities of $1 across all reported periods suggest minimal operational debt, which is a positive sign.
Transparency is generally good given the availability of 990 filings. The consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation enhances trust, indicating that the foundation's leadership is not drawing salaries from its funds. However, the lack of detailed expense categorization in the provided data limits a deeper analysis of how efficiently funds are being allocated beyond the grants themselves.