Consistent revenue growth (from $60.6M in 2014 to $95.3M in 2023)
Healthy asset growth (from $72.7M in 2014 to $95.0M in 2023)
Generally positive operating margins (revenue often exceeds expenses)
Spending Breakdown
How Touro University allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Touro University
Is Touro University a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Touro University (EIN: 133838740) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 1 red flag identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Touro University a good charity to donate to?
Touro University has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $100.1M. Assets: $105.4M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Touro University?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Touro University is 133838740. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Touro University spend its money?
Touro University allocates 85% to programs, 10% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Touro University's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Touro University's tax-exempt status using EIN 133838740 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Touro University demonstrates consistent financial growth over the past decade, with revenues increasing from $60.6 million in 2014 to $95.3 million in 2023. The organization generally operates with a surplus, as seen in 2023 where revenue of $95.3 million exceeded expenses of $87.5 million, contributing to a healthy increase in assets from $72.7 million in 2014 to $95.0 million in 2023. This indicates sound financial management and an ability to build reserves.
While specific program, administrative, and fundraising spending breakdowns are not provided in the summary data, the consistent growth in assets and revenue suggests effective resource allocation. The absence of reported officer compensation across all filings is a notable point regarding transparency, as it could indicate that executive compensation is reported differently or that the organization's structure does not involve direct officer compensation as typically reported on Part VII of the 990. Further investigation into the full 990 forms would be necessary to fully understand executive remuneration practices.
Overall, Touro University appears to be in a stable financial position, consistently growing its revenue and assets. The organization's ability to manage expenses below revenue in most years, coupled with a significant increase in assets, points to a financially healthy and sustainable operation. The lack of reported officer compensation warrants further review for complete transparency.