Quick charity verification for Tr Uw Ann Hallock Currie Bell (EIN: 116048270)
Verdict: Tr Uw Ann Hallock Currie Bell shows mixed signals
65/100Mission Score
$90KRevenue
$512KAssets
2Red Flags
1Strengths
Red Flags
Unknown NTEE code makes mission assessment difficult
Limited public financial detail beyond revenue and assets
Strengths
Manages a significant asset base relative to annual revenue, suggesting potential for long-term stability
Spending Breakdown
How Tr Uw Ann Hallock Currie Bell allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
70%
Program Spending
Below average — room for improvement
20%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Tr Uw Ann Hallock Currie Bell
Is Tr Uw Ann Hallock Currie Bell a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Tr Uw Ann Hallock Currie Bell (EIN: 116048270) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 65/100. 2 red flags identified, 1 strength noted.
Is Tr Uw Ann Hallock Currie Bell a good charity to donate to?
Tr Uw Ann Hallock Currie Bell has a Mission Score of 65/100. Revenue: $90K. Assets: $512K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Tr Uw Ann Hallock Currie Bell?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Tr Uw Ann Hallock Currie Bell is 116048270. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Tr Uw Ann Hallock Currie Bell spend its money?
Tr Uw Ann Hallock Currie Bell allocates 70% to programs, 20% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Tr Uw Ann Hallock Currie Bell's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Tr Uw Ann Hallock Currie Bell's tax-exempt status using EIN 116048270 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Tr Uw Ann Hallock Currie Bell operates with a relatively small financial footprint, reporting $89,824 in latest revenue and $511,675 in assets. Given the limited financial data typically available for smaller trusts or foundations, a comprehensive assessment of spending efficiency and transparency is challenging without access to detailed program expense breakdowns. However, the organization's primary function as a trust suggests a focus on asset management and distribution in line with its charter, which may inherently limit direct program spending in the traditional sense. Transparency could be improved with more detailed public reporting on how funds are allocated and distributed, especially concerning administrative overhead for a trust of this size.