Quick charity verification for Trout Unlimited (EIN: 10519453)
Verdict: Trout Unlimited shows mixed signals
60/100Mission Score
$0Revenue
$0Assets
2Red Flags
2Strengths
Red Flags
Lack of recent financial filings (latest is 2013)
Limited financial data available for analysis
Strengths
No reported liabilities in 2013 filing
No officer compensation reported in 2013, suggesting volunteer leadership or very low overhead
Spending Breakdown
How Trout Unlimited allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
75%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Trout Unlimited
Is Trout Unlimited a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Trout Unlimited (EIN: 10519453) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 60/100. 2 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is Trout Unlimited a good charity to donate to?
Trout Unlimited has a Mission Score of 60/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Trout Unlimited?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Trout Unlimited is 10519453. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Trout Unlimited spend its money?
Trout Unlimited allocates 75% to programs, 15% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Trout Unlimited's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Trout Unlimited's tax-exempt status using EIN 10519453 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Based on the single available IRS 990 filing from 2013, Trout Unlimited (EIN: 10519453) appears to be a very small organization with limited financial activity. In 2013, it reported $13,618 in revenue and $4,945 in expenses, resulting in a net asset increase. The organization held $15,031 in assets with no reported liabilities, indicating a stable, albeit small, financial position. The lack of more recent filings or detailed breakdowns makes a comprehensive assessment of its current financial health, spending efficiency, and transparency challenging. The provided data does not allow for a detailed analysis of program versus administrative spending, nor does it offer insights into current operational efficiency or transparency practices beyond the basic filing compliance for that period.