Latest filing shows $0 revenue and assets, suggesting dormancy or cessation of operations.
NTEE Code is unknown, which can sometimes hinder understanding of its specific programmatic focus.
Strengths
Consistently reported $0 officer compensation across all filings, indicating efficient use of funds.
Maintained $0 liabilities across all reported periods, demonstrating fiscal responsibility.
Historically operated with modest but consistent revenue streams when active.
Spending Breakdown
How Tulsa Sports Charities Inc allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Tulsa Sports Charities Inc
Is Tulsa Sports Charities Inc a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Tulsa Sports Charities Inc (EIN: 202129486) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 70/100. 2 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Tulsa Sports Charities Inc a good charity to donate to?
Tulsa Sports Charities Inc has a Mission Score of 70/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Tulsa Sports Charities Inc?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Tulsa Sports Charities Inc is 202129486. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Tulsa Sports Charities Inc spend its money?
Tulsa Sports Charities Inc allocates 90% to programs, 10% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Tulsa Sports Charities Inc's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Tulsa Sports Charities Inc's tax-exempt status using EIN 202129486 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Tulsa Sports Charities Inc. appears to be a very small organization, as indicated by its latest reported revenue and assets of $0. While historical filings show some activity, the most recent data suggests either dormancy or a significant reduction in operations. The organization consistently reported zero officer compensation across all available filings, which is a positive indicator for resource allocation directly to its mission, assuming the organization was active during those periods. However, the lack of current financial data makes a comprehensive assessment of its present financial health and spending efficiency challenging. The consistent reporting of $0 liabilities across all periods suggests a fiscally conservative approach, avoiding debt.