How Twin Cities Diversity In Practice allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Twin Cities Diversity In Practice
Is Twin Cities Diversity In Practice a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Twin Cities Diversity In Practice (EIN: 203010154) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 92/100. 1 red flag identified, 5 strengths noted.
Is Twin Cities Diversity In Practice a good charity to donate to?
Twin Cities Diversity In Practice has a Mission Score of 92/100. Revenue: $862K. Assets: $897K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Twin Cities Diversity In Practice?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Twin Cities Diversity In Practice is 203010154. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Twin Cities Diversity In Practice spend its money?
Twin Cities Diversity In Practice allocates 85% to programs, 10% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Twin Cities Diversity In Practice's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Twin Cities Diversity In Practice's tax-exempt status using EIN 203010154 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Twin Cities Diversity In Practice demonstrates consistent financial growth and strong program focus. Over the past five years, revenue has steadily increased from $453,902 in 2019 to $810,211 in 2023, indicating growing support for its mission. The organization consistently operates with a surplus, as seen in 2023 where revenue of $810,211 exceeded expenses of $695,934, contributing to a healthy growth in assets from $445,875 in 2019 to $891,047 in 2023. This financial stability suggests effective management and a sustainable operational model.
The organization's spending efficiency appears robust, with a significant portion of its expenses likely directed towards its programs, given the NTEE code S41 (Legal Services) and the absence of reported officer compensation. The consistent growth in assets and revenue, coupled with manageable liabilities, points to a well-managed financial position. The lack of reported officer compensation across all available filings is a notable aspect of its transparency and resource allocation.
Overall, Twin Cities Diversity In Practice exhibits strong financial health, efficient spending practices, and a high degree of transparency, particularly concerning executive compensation. Its consistent growth and prudent financial management position it well to continue its mission in promoting diversity in the legal profession.