No officer compensation reported, suggesting volunteer leadership and low executive overhead
Spending Breakdown
How Tyler Aaron Bookman Memorial Foundation Trust allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
70%
Program Spending
Below average — room for improvement
20%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Tyler Aaron Bookman Memorial Foundation Trust
Is Tyler Aaron Bookman Memorial Foundation Trust a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Tyler Aaron Bookman Memorial Foundation Trust (EIN: 207496862) has notable concerns. Mission Score: 30/100. 3 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is Tyler Aaron Bookman Memorial Foundation Trust a good charity to donate to?
Tyler Aaron Bookman Memorial Foundation Trust has a Mission Score of 30/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Tyler Aaron Bookman Memorial Foundation Trust?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Tyler Aaron Bookman Memorial Foundation Trust is 207496862. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Tyler Aaron Bookman Memorial Foundation Trust spend its money?
Tyler Aaron Bookman Memorial Foundation Trust allocates 70% to programs, 20% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Tyler Aaron Bookman Memorial Foundation Trust's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Tyler Aaron Bookman Memorial Foundation Trust's tax-exempt status using EIN 207496862 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Tyler Aaron Bookman Memorial Foundation Trust appears to be in a state of financial decline, with its latest filing showing $0 in both revenue and assets. This follows a consistent trend of expenses significantly exceeding revenue in prior years, leading to a steady depletion of assets from $166,776 in 2011 to $0 in the latest period. For example, in 2015, the organization reported $10,923 in revenue against $23,212 in expenses. This operational model is unsustainable and suggests the organization may no longer be active or has ceased operations.
Given the lack of detailed expense breakdowns in the provided data, it's challenging to assess spending efficiency beyond the overall deficit. However, the consistent negative net income indicates that the organization was not efficiently managing its resources to sustain its operations. The absence of officer compensation across all reported periods suggests a volunteer-led structure, which can be a positive for efficiency if other costs are well-managed.
Transparency is difficult to fully ascertain without access to the full 990 forms, but the consistent filing history is a positive indicator of compliance. However, the current financial state of $0 revenue and assets raises significant questions about its ongoing activities and future viability, which would ideally be clarified in its public filings.