Quick charity verification for Ua Ao O Kapolei (EIN: 204816039)
Verdict: Ua Ao O Kapolei shows mixed signals
55/100Mission Score
$0Revenue
$0Assets
4Red Flags
2Strengths
Red Flags
Consistent deficit spending in multiple years (e.g., 2015, 2014, 2013)
Latest filing shows $0 revenue and $0 assets, indicating potential inactivity or severe financial distress
Significant drop in revenue from a peak of $24,500 in 2012 to $0 in the latest period
Lack of detailed expense breakdown makes it difficult to assess program efficiency
Strengths
Consistent 0% officer compensation, indicating efficient use of funds at the executive level
History of IRS 990 filings, demonstrating some level of compliance and transparency over time
Spending Breakdown
How Ua Ao O Kapolei allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
75%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Ua Ao O Kapolei
Is Ua Ao O Kapolei a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Ua Ao O Kapolei (EIN: 204816039) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 55/100. 4 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is Ua Ao O Kapolei a good charity to donate to?
Ua Ao O Kapolei has a Mission Score of 55/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Ua Ao O Kapolei?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Ua Ao O Kapolei is 204816039. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Ua Ao O Kapolei spend its money?
Ua Ao O Kapolei allocates 75% to programs, 15% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Ua Ao O Kapolei's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Ua Ao O Kapolei's tax-exempt status using EIN 204816039 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Ua Ao O Kapolei appears to be a very small, community-focused organization, as indicated by its modest revenues and assets over its filing history. The organization has consistently reported zero assets and liabilities in recent years, with the exception of 2010 and 2012, suggesting minimal financial activity or a reliance on immediate pass-through funding. Its financial health shows a pattern of expenses often exceeding revenue, particularly in the 2013-2015 period, which could indicate operational challenges or a reliance on prior year reserves or unrecorded in-kind support. The latest filing shows zero revenue and assets, which is concerning and suggests the organization may be inactive or in a transitional phase.
Spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed breakdown of expenses, but the consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all filings suggests that executive overhead is not a significant drain on resources, which is a positive sign for a small nonprofit. However, the consistent deficit spending in several years (e.g., $543 revenue vs. $6,154 expenses in 2015) raises questions about how these deficits were covered and the sustainability of operations. The lack of detailed expense categories in the provided data makes it impossible to determine program vs. administrative spending ratios.
Transparency regarding executive compensation is excellent, with no reported officer compensation. However, the overall financial picture, particularly the recent zero revenue and assets, lacks clarity regarding the organization's current operational status and future viability. While the organization has a filing history, the limited financial details provided make a comprehensive assessment of its spending efficiency and overall financial health challenging.