Declining assets over time (from $281 in 2012 to $183 in 2019), suggesting an unsustainable financial trend.
Strengths
Consistent IRS 990 filing history, indicating basic compliance and transparency.
0% officer compensation reported across all filings, demonstrating responsible executive pay practices relative to its size.
Spending Breakdown
How Ufa Alumni Art Fund allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
50%
Program Spending
Below average — room for improvement
30%
Admin Costs
High — over 25% on administration
20%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Ufa Alumni Art Fund
Is Ufa Alumni Art Fund a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Ufa Alumni Art Fund (EIN: 156014946) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 40/100. 3 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is Ufa Alumni Art Fund a good charity to donate to?
Ufa Alumni Art Fund has a Mission Score of 40/100. Revenue: $5. Assets: $183. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Ufa Alumni Art Fund?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Ufa Alumni Art Fund is 156014946. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Ufa Alumni Art Fund spend its money?
Ufa Alumni Art Fund allocates 50% to programs, 30% to administration, and 20% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Ufa Alumni Art Fund's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Ufa Alumni Art Fund's tax-exempt status using EIN 156014946 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Ufa Alumni Art Fund appears to be a very small organization with minimal financial activity. Its latest reported revenue is only $5, with assets of $183. The organization consistently reports expenses exceeding its revenue, for example, in 2019, revenue was $5 while expenses were $15. This indicates a reliance on existing assets or prior period surpluses to cover operational costs, which is not sustainable in the long term without significant new funding. Given the extremely low revenue and asset figures, it's challenging to assess spending efficiency in a traditional sense, as the scale of operations is negligible. The organization has consistently reported 0% officer compensation across all filings, which is a positive sign regarding executive pay relative to its size. However, the lack of detailed financial breakdowns for such small amounts makes a deep analysis of program versus administrative spending difficult. The organization has filed its 990s consistently, indicating a basic level of transparency.