High mission score due to efficiency and program focus.
Spending Breakdown
How Umb Health Sciences Research Park Corporation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Umb Health Sciences Research Park Corporation
Is Umb Health Sciences Research Park Corporation a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Umb Health Sciences Research Park Corporation (EIN: 141875043) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 95/100. 0 red flags identified, 5 strengths noted.
Is Umb Health Sciences Research Park Corporation a good charity to donate to?
Umb Health Sciences Research Park Corporation has a Mission Score of 95/100. Revenue: $5.4M. Assets: $17.9M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Umb Health Sciences Research Park Corporation?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Umb Health Sciences Research Park Corporation is 141875043. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Umb Health Sciences Research Park Corporation spend its money?
Umb Health Sciences Research Park Corporation allocates 90% to programs, 10% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Umb Health Sciences Research Park Corporation's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Umb Health Sciences Research Park Corporation's tax-exempt status using EIN 141875043 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Umb Health Sciences Research Park Corporation demonstrates a stable financial position with consistent asset growth over the past decade, reaching $17,897,910 in the latest period. The organization consistently reports zero officer compensation, which is a strong indicator of financial transparency and a focus on mission-related spending rather than executive enrichment. While specific program spending details are not provided in the summary data, the absence of officer compensation suggests a lean operational structure. The organization has shown significant fluctuations in revenue, with a peak of over $8 million in 2014 and more recent revenues around $3-5 million, indicating potential reliance on specific grants or projects. However, expenses have remained relatively stable, suggesting efficient management of resources despite revenue variability.
The organization's financial health appears robust, with assets significantly exceeding liabilities across all reported periods. For instance, in 2023, assets were $17,616,030 against liabilities of $1,190,037. This strong balance sheet provides a solid foundation for its operations. The consistent growth in assets, from $13.7 million in 2014 to nearly $18 million currently, further underscores its financial stability. The lack of reported officer compensation is a key strength in terms of transparency and public trust, as it implies that all funds are directed towards the organization's objectives.