Long history of IRS 990 filings (13 filings), demonstrating transparency and longevity
Generally consistent revenue stream around $1 million over the past decade, indicating stable funding sources
Spending Breakdown
How Upper Columbia Salmon Recovery Board allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Upper Columbia Salmon Recovery Board
Is Upper Columbia Salmon Recovery Board a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Upper Columbia Salmon Recovery Board (EIN: 204703769) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 90/100. 2 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Upper Columbia Salmon Recovery Board a good charity to donate to?
Upper Columbia Salmon Recovery Board has a Mission Score of 90/100. Revenue: $1.1M. Assets: $230K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Upper Columbia Salmon Recovery Board?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Upper Columbia Salmon Recovery Board is 204703769. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Upper Columbia Salmon Recovery Board spend its money?
Upper Columbia Salmon Recovery Board allocates 85% to programs, 10% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Upper Columbia Salmon Recovery Board's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Upper Columbia Salmon Recovery Board's tax-exempt status using EIN 204703769 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Upper Columbia Salmon Recovery Board demonstrates a consistent operational scale, with annual revenues generally fluctuating around $1 million over the past decade. While the organization's assets have varied, they remain relatively modest compared to its annual revenue, suggesting a focus on immediate program delivery rather than significant asset accumulation. For instance, in 2023, assets were $17,504 against revenues of $742,663. The organization consistently reports zero officer compensation, which is a strong indicator of financial transparency and a commitment to directing funds towards its mission rather than executive salaries. However, the 2023 filing shows expenses ($905,463) exceeding revenue ($742,663), indicating a deficit for that period, which warrants monitoring to ensure long-term sustainability. Overall, the organization appears to be transparent with its financial reporting, particularly regarding compensation.