Demonstrated ability to generate surpluses in some years (e.g., 2023, 2019), showing potential for financial health.
Long filing history (13 filings) indicates sustained operation and compliance with IRS reporting requirements.
Spending Breakdown
How Upper Midlands Rural Health Network allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Upper Midlands Rural Health Network
Is Upper Midlands Rural Health Network a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Upper Midlands Rural Health Network (EIN: 203381102) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 75/100. 3 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Upper Midlands Rural Health Network a good charity to donate to?
Upper Midlands Rural Health Network has a Mission Score of 75/100. Revenue: $40K. Assets: $115K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Upper Midlands Rural Health Network?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Upper Midlands Rural Health Network is 203381102. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Upper Midlands Rural Health Network spend its money?
Upper Midlands Rural Health Network allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Upper Midlands Rural Health Network's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Upper Midlands Rural Health Network's tax-exempt status using EIN 203381102 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Upper Midlands Rural Health Network demonstrates a fluctuating financial performance over the past decade. While the organization reported a surplus in 2023 with revenues of $258,850 exceeding expenses of $241,351, it has experienced deficits in several prior years, such as in 2022 ($181,822 revenue vs. $199,467 expenses) and 2021 ($290,452 revenue vs. $313,105 expenses). This indicates a need for more consistent financial management to ensure long-term stability.
The organization's assets have also shown significant variability, peaking at $380,454 in 2019 and then declining to $64,002 by 2023. The latest reported assets of $114,517, while an improvement from 2023, are still considerably lower than previous highs. The consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all filings suggests a commitment to minimizing administrative overhead related to executive pay, which is a positive indicator for donor confidence. However, without a detailed breakdown of expenses into program, administrative, and fundraising categories, a full assessment of spending efficiency is challenging.
Overall, the network appears to be managing its finances without incurring executive compensation, which is a strong point for transparency. However, the inconsistent revenue generation and asset accumulation suggest potential challenges in securing stable funding or managing operational costs effectively. Further detail on expense allocation would enhance the transparency report.