Inconsistent financial performance in active years, with some periods showing expenses exceeding revenue (e.g., 2014 expenses of $98,135 against $60,168 revenue).
Strengths
Consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all available filings, suggesting efficient use of funds for leadership.
History of filing IRS 990s, indicating a commitment to transparency during its active years.
Spending Breakdown
How Us Green Building Council Az Chapter allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
75%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Us Green Building Council Az Chapter
Is Us Green Building Council Az Chapter a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Us Green Building Council Az Chapter (EIN: 200033383) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 40/100. 2 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is Us Green Building Council Az Chapter a good charity to donate to?
Us Green Building Council Az Chapter has a Mission Score of 40/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Us Green Building Council Az Chapter?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Us Green Building Council Az Chapter is 200033383. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Us Green Building Council Az Chapter spend its money?
Us Green Building Council Az Chapter allocates 75% to programs, 15% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Us Green Building Council Az Chapter's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Us Green Building Council Az Chapter's tax-exempt status using EIN 200033383 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Us Green Building Council Az Chapter appears to be in a state of financial decline, as evidenced by its latest reported revenue and assets of $0. This is a significant drop from its historical performance, where it consistently reported revenues between $60,168 and $128,494 and assets between $36,740 and $82,026 in previous years. The organization's spending efficiency is difficult to assess without detailed expense breakdowns for its operational periods, but the consistent reporting of $0 for officer compensation across all available filings suggests a lean approach to executive pay, which is a positive indicator for donor confidence. However, the current financial state raises serious questions about its ongoing viability and ability to fulfill its mission.
Transparency is generally good given the availability of multiple years of IRS 990 filings, which consistently show no officer compensation. However, the abrupt cessation of financial activity to $0 in the latest period, without further context, creates an information gap. Donors would benefit from a clear explanation of this significant change, whether it represents a merger, dissolution, or a temporary pause in operations. Without this, the overall transparency, while historically sound, is currently hampered by the lack of clarity regarding its present status.