Consistently reports zero liabilities, indicating no debt burden
Maintains a healthy asset base relative to its size (e.g., $87,789 in assets for 202312)
Consistent filing history over 13 periods, indicating compliance
Spending Breakdown
How Utah Property Rights Coalition allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
70%
Program Spending
Below average — room for improvement
20%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Utah Property Rights Coalition
Is Utah Property Rights Coalition a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Utah Property Rights Coalition (EIN: 204375390) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 65/100. 3 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Utah Property Rights Coalition a good charity to donate to?
Utah Property Rights Coalition has a Mission Score of 65/100. Revenue: $202K. Assets: $133K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Utah Property Rights Coalition?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Utah Property Rights Coalition is 204375390. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Utah Property Rights Coalition spend its money?
Utah Property Rights Coalition allocates 70% to programs, 20% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Utah Property Rights Coalition's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Utah Property Rights Coalition's tax-exempt status using EIN 204375390 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Utah Property Rights Coalition demonstrates consistent financial activity, with revenues fluctuating between $59,000 and $144,204 over the past decade. In the most recent filing (202312), the organization reported revenues of $100,000 against expenses of $142,096, indicating a deficit for the period. This trend of expenses exceeding revenue is also visible in 202212 ($64,000 revenue vs. $87,438 expenses) and 201812 ($59,000 revenue vs. $90,446 expenses), suggesting a reliance on prior year reserves or inconsistent funding. The organization consistently reports zero liabilities, which is a positive indicator of financial stability and low debt burden. However, the lack of detailed spending breakdowns (e.g., program vs. administrative vs. fundraising) in the provided data makes a precise assessment of spending efficiency challenging. The consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation suggests either a volunteer-led organization or that compensation is not reported in this section, which could impact transparency regarding leadership costs.