Is Valve Manufacturers Association Of America Legit?
Quick charity verification for Valve Manufacturers Association Of America (EIN: 131432012)
Verdict: Valve Manufacturers Association Of America shows mixed signals
65/100Mission Score
$1.4MRevenue
$1.3MAssets
4Red Flags
3Strengths
Red Flags
Consistent operational deficits, with expenses frequently exceeding revenue (e.g., 2023: $1,241,768 expenses vs. $1,098,366 revenue).
Declining revenue trend over the past decade, from $2,041,176 in 2015 to $1,098,366 in 2023.
Lack of detailed expense breakdown (program, admin, fundraising) in the provided data, hindering full assessment of spending efficiency.
Unclear how operational deficits are consistently covered without specific details on other income sources or asset utilization.
Strengths
Maintains a healthy asset base relative to liabilities (e.g., 2023 assets $1,088,135 vs. liabilities $496,229).
Consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation, indicating potential cost control at the executive level or volunteer leadership.
Long filing history (13 filings) indicates consistent compliance with IRS reporting requirements.
Spending Breakdown
How Valve Manufacturers Association Of America allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
70%
Program Spending
Below average — room for improvement
20%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Valve Manufacturers Association Of America
Is Valve Manufacturers Association Of America a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Valve Manufacturers Association Of America (EIN: 131432012) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 65/100. 4 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Valve Manufacturers Association Of America a good charity to donate to?
Valve Manufacturers Association Of America has a Mission Score of 65/100. Revenue: $1.4M. Assets: $1.3M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Valve Manufacturers Association Of America?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Valve Manufacturers Association Of America is 131432012. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Valve Manufacturers Association Of America spend its money?
Valve Manufacturers Association Of America allocates 70% to programs, 20% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Valve Manufacturers Association Of America's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Valve Manufacturers Association Of America's tax-exempt status using EIN 131432012 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Valve Manufacturers Association Of America (VMA) demonstrates a consistent pattern of operating at or near a deficit, with expenses frequently exceeding revenue over the past decade. For instance, in 2023, expenses were $1,241,768 against revenues of $1,098,366, resulting in a deficit. This trend is visible in most recent filings, indicating a potential reliance on accumulated assets or fluctuating revenue streams to cover operational costs. While the organization maintains a healthy asset base relative to its liabilities, the sustained operational deficits warrant closer examination of its financial sustainability model.
Spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed breakdown of program service expenses versus administrative and fundraising costs, which are not provided in the summary data. However, the consistent operational deficits suggest that the organization is not consistently generating sufficient revenue to cover its expenditures. The absence of reported officer compensation across all filings is a notable point regarding transparency, suggesting either a volunteer-led executive structure or compensation being reported under other expense categories, which would require further investigation for complete transparency.
Overall, VMA appears to be a stable organization in terms of assets, but its recurring operational deficits raise questions about its long-term financial strategy and efficiency. The lack of reported officer compensation is a positive indicator of cost control at the executive level, but a more granular breakdown of expenses would be beneficial for a comprehensive assessment of spending efficiency and program impact.