Is Veterans Of Foreign Wars Department Of New Hampshire Legit?
Quick charity verification for Veterans Of Foreign Wars Department Of New Hampshire (EIN: 20209443)
Verdict: Veterans Of Foreign Wars Department Of New Hampshire appears trustworthy
75/100Mission Score
$0Revenue
$0Assets
2Red Flags
4Strengths
Red Flags
Operational deficits in multiple years (e.g., 2018, 2017, 2016) where expenses exceeded revenue.
Lack of detailed expense breakdown (program, admin, fundraising) in the provided summary data, making efficiency analysis difficult.
Strengths
Consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation, indicating low executive overhead.
Maintains a stable asset base over time, ranging from $114,223 to $150,038, suggesting financial resilience.
Consistently reports $0 in liabilities, indicating a very strong balance sheet and low financial risk.
Regularly files IRS Form 990s, demonstrating commitment to transparency.
Spending Breakdown
How Veterans Of Foreign Wars Department Of New Hampshire allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Veterans Of Foreign Wars Department Of New Hampshire
Is Veterans Of Foreign Wars Department Of New Hampshire a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Veterans Of Foreign Wars Department Of New Hampshire (EIN: 20209443) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 75/100. 2 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is Veterans Of Foreign Wars Department Of New Hampshire a good charity to donate to?
Veterans Of Foreign Wars Department Of New Hampshire has a Mission Score of 75/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Veterans Of Foreign Wars Department Of New Hampshire?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Veterans Of Foreign Wars Department Of New Hampshire is 20209443. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Veterans Of Foreign Wars Department Of New Hampshire spend its money?
Veterans Of Foreign Wars Department Of New Hampshire allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Veterans Of Foreign Wars Department Of New Hampshire's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Veterans Of Foreign Wars Department Of New Hampshire's tax-exempt status using EIN 20209443 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Veterans Of Foreign Wars Department Of New Hampshire appears to be a small, stable organization based on its IRS 990 filings. Over the past nine years, its revenue has fluctuated, ranging from a low of $28,216 in 2018 to a high of $93,804 in 2011. Expenses have generally tracked revenue, with the organization operating at a slight deficit in most years, such as in 2018 where expenses ($51,359) exceeded revenue ($28,216). However, its asset base has remained relatively consistent, hovering around $114,000 to $150,000, indicating a degree of financial stability despite year-to-year operational variances. The organization consistently reports zero liabilities, which is a strong indicator of financial health and low risk.
The organization's spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses, which are not provided in the summary data. However, the consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation suggests that leadership is likely volunteer-based, which can contribute to lower administrative overhead. The lack of detailed expense categories in the provided data limits a precise evaluation of how efficiently funds are allocated to its mission versus overhead.
Transparency is generally good given the consistent filing of IRS Form 990s. The absence of officer compensation is a positive sign for transparency regarding executive pay. However, without a more granular breakdown of expenses, it's challenging to fully understand the allocation of funds. The organization's consistent asset base and minimal liabilities suggest responsible financial management, but a deeper dive into program activities would be beneficial for a complete transparency assessment.