Quick charity verification for Voter Ga (EIN: 161761224)
Verdict: Voter Ga appears trustworthy
75/100Mission Score
$384KRevenue
$248KAssets
2Red Flags
3Strengths
Red Flags
Inconsistent financial performance with a significant deficit in 2022 ($200,288 revenue vs. $320,859 expenses)
Lack of detailed expense breakdown in provided data makes it difficult to fully assess program vs. administrative spending efficiency.
Strengths
Consistently reports zero liabilities, indicating strong financial health and no outstanding debt.
Reports 0% officer compensation across all filings, demonstrating a commitment to directing funds to the mission.
Positive net income in two out of three reported periods (2021 and 2023).
Spending Breakdown
How Voter Ga allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Voter Ga
Is Voter Ga a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Voter Ga (EIN: 161761224) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 75/100. 2 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Voter Ga a good charity to donate to?
Voter Ga has a Mission Score of 75/100. Revenue: $384K. Assets: $248K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Voter Ga?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Voter Ga is 161761224. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Voter Ga spend its money?
Voter Ga allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Voter Ga's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Voter Ga's tax-exempt status using EIN 161761224 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Voter Ga demonstrates a fluctuating financial performance over the past three years. While the organization reported a positive net income in 2023 ($240,262 revenue vs. $193,117 expenses) and 2021 ($311,067 revenue vs. $134,964 expenses), it experienced a significant deficit in 2022, with expenses ($320,859) substantially exceeding revenue ($200,288). This inconsistency suggests potential challenges in revenue predictability or expense management. The organization consistently reports zero liabilities and zero officer compensation, which are positive indicators of financial stability and a commitment to directing resources towards its mission rather than executive pay. However, without a detailed breakdown of expenses, it's challenging to fully assess spending efficiency, particularly the allocation between program, administrative, and fundraising costs. The absence of officer compensation also suggests a volunteer-led or very lean executive structure, which can be efficient but also raises questions about long-term leadership sustainability if not adequately addressed.