Quick charity verification for Vsa Arts Of New Hampshire (EIN: 20398863)
Verdict: Vsa Arts Of New Hampshire has notable concerns
30/100Mission Score
$0Revenue
$0Assets
3Red Flags
1Strengths
Red Flags
Latest reported revenue and assets are $0, suggesting inactivity.
Consistent deficit spending in prior years (e.g., $28,834 expenses vs. $17,993 revenue in 2012).
Significant decrease in assets from $25,637 in 2011 to $0 currently.
Strengths
No officer compensation reported in 2011 and 2012, indicating efficient executive spending during those periods.
Spending Breakdown
How Vsa Arts Of New Hampshire allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Vsa Arts Of New Hampshire
Is Vsa Arts Of New Hampshire a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Vsa Arts Of New Hampshire (EIN: 20398863) has notable concerns. Mission Score: 30/100. 3 red flags identified, 1 strength noted.
Is Vsa Arts Of New Hampshire a good charity to donate to?
Vsa Arts Of New Hampshire has a Mission Score of 30/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Vsa Arts Of New Hampshire?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Vsa Arts Of New Hampshire is 20398863. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Vsa Arts Of New Hampshire spend its money?
Vsa Arts Of New Hampshire allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Vsa Arts Of New Hampshire's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Vsa Arts Of New Hampshire's tax-exempt status using EIN 20398863 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Vsa Arts Of New Hampshire appears to be a very small organization, as indicated by its latest reported revenue and assets of $0. Reviewing its prior filings, the organization consistently operated at a deficit, with expenses exceeding revenue in both 2011 and 2012. For example, in 2012, expenses were $28,834 against revenues of $17,993, and in 2011, expenses were $22,548 against revenues of $19,448. This consistent deficit spending, coupled with the current $0 revenue and assets, suggests significant financial challenges or potential inactivity. The organization's transparency is limited by the lack of recent financial activity, making it difficult to assess current operations or financial health. The absence of officer compensation in the reported periods is a positive note regarding executive spending efficiency for those years.