Extensive filing history (15 filings) demonstrates strong compliance and transparency.
Spending Breakdown
How Washington Rheumatology Alliance allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Washington Rheumatology Alliance
Is Washington Rheumatology Alliance a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Washington Rheumatology Alliance (EIN: 201766864) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 1 red flag identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is Washington Rheumatology Alliance a good charity to donate to?
Washington Rheumatology Alliance has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $184K. Assets: $626K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Washington Rheumatology Alliance?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Washington Rheumatology Alliance is 201766864. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Washington Rheumatology Alliance spend its money?
Washington Rheumatology Alliance allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Washington Rheumatology Alliance's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Washington Rheumatology Alliance's tax-exempt status using EIN 201766864 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Washington Rheumatology Alliance demonstrates consistent financial health with a strong asset base and no reported liabilities across all available filings. While revenue has fluctuated, ranging from a low of $75,169 in 2020 to a high of $388,665 in 2017, the organization has generally maintained positive net assets, growing from $66,032 in 2014 to $629,730 in 2023. The organization's expenses have also varied, but in the most recent period (2023), expenses ($217,767) exceeded revenue ($188,377), indicating a deficit for that year. However, this appears to be an anomaly given the overall trend of asset growth.
Spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses, which are not provided in the summary data. However, the consistent growth in assets suggests prudent financial management over the long term. The absence of reported officer compensation across all filings indicates a volunteer-led or very lean executive structure, which can contribute to lower administrative overhead.
In terms of transparency, the organization has a robust filing history with 15 IRS 990 filings, indicating consistent compliance with reporting requirements. The lack of reported liabilities is a positive sign of financial stability. However, without more granular expense data, a complete picture of how funds are allocated to programs versus overhead remains somewhat opaque from this summary.