Quick charity verification for Water For Our World (EIN: 208359365)
Verdict: Water For Our World has notable concerns
30/100Mission Score
$0Revenue
$0Assets
3Red Flags
1Strengths
Red Flags
Latest filing shows $0 revenue and $0 assets, indicating potential inactivity or closure.
Consistent deficit spending in prior years (e.g., $122,348 expenses vs. $105,621 revenue in 2014).
Small asset base ($27,184 in 2014) suggesting limited financial reserves.
Strengths
No reported officer compensation, suggesting a volunteer-driven model or efficient use of funds for leadership.
Spending Breakdown
How Water For Our World allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Water For Our World
Is Water For Our World a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Water For Our World (EIN: 208359365) has notable concerns. Mission Score: 30/100. 3 red flags identified, 1 strength noted.
Is Water For Our World a good charity to donate to?
Water For Our World has a Mission Score of 30/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Water For Our World?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Water For Our World is 208359365. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Water For Our World spend its money?
Water For Our World allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Water For Our World's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Water For Our World's tax-exempt status using EIN 208359365 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Water For Our World appears to be a very small organization, as indicated by its modest revenues and assets over the past four years. The latest filing shows $0 in revenue and assets, which is a significant concern and suggests the organization may no longer be active or has ceased operations. In prior years, the organization consistently spent more than it brought in, with expenses exceeding revenue in three out of four reported periods (e.g., $122,348 expenses vs. $105,621 revenue in 2014). This pattern of deficit spending, even at a small scale, is unsustainable. The lack of reported officer compensation across all filings suggests either a volunteer-run model or that compensation was below reporting thresholds, which is common for very small nonprofits. However, the current $0 revenue and assets raise serious questions about its ongoing viability and impact.