No reported officer compensation across all filings, indicating potential volunteer leadership or lean administrative structure.
Spending Breakdown
How Waters Of Life Outreach Ministry allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
0%
Program Spending
Concerning — less than half to programs
0%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Waters Of Life Outreach Ministry
Is Waters Of Life Outreach Ministry a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Waters Of Life Outreach Ministry (EIN: 20696737) has notable concerns. Mission Score: 20/100. 3 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is Waters Of Life Outreach Ministry a good charity to donate to?
Waters Of Life Outreach Ministry has a Mission Score of 20/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Waters Of Life Outreach Ministry?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Waters Of Life Outreach Ministry is 20696737. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Waters Of Life Outreach Ministry spend its money?
Waters Of Life Outreach Ministry allocates 0% to programs, 0% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Waters Of Life Outreach Ministry's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Waters Of Life Outreach Ministry's tax-exempt status using EIN 20696737 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Waters Of Life Outreach Ministry has a concerning financial profile, primarily due to its latest filing reporting $0 in both revenue and assets, which is a significant departure from previous years where it consistently reported over $90,000 in revenue and over $550,000 in assets. This abrupt change raises serious questions about its current operational status and financial health. While historical filings show consistent revenue generation and asset accumulation, the most recent data suggests a complete cessation of financial activity or a significant reporting error.
Historically, the organization has maintained a relatively stable financial position, with revenues generally exceeding expenses in most years, leading to asset growth. For instance, in 2017, revenue was $141,603 against expenses of $126,092. However, the lack of any reported financial activity in the latest filing makes it impossible to assess current spending efficiency or program focus. The absence of officer compensation across all reported periods suggests a volunteer-led or very lean administrative structure, which could be a positive indicator of efficiency if the organization were actively operating.
Given the stark contrast between historical data and the latest filing, the organization's transparency is severely hampered. Without clarification on the $0 revenue and assets, it's difficult to ascertain if the organization is still active, has ceased operations, or if there's a data anomaly. This lack of current financial information prevents a meaningful assessment of its financial health and spending efficiency.