Quick charity verification for Wham Pta (EIN: 202375583)
Verdict: Wham Pta appears trustworthy
85/100Mission Score
$0Revenue
$0Assets
2Red Flags
3Strengths
Red Flags
Latest filing shows $0 revenue and assets, raising questions about current operational status.
NTEE code is unknown, which can sometimes hinder clear understanding of mission focus.
Strengths
Consistently reports 0% officer compensation, indicating efficient use of funds for its mission.
Maintained positive net assets in previous active years (e.g., $19,751 in 2014).
Expenses generally align with or are less than revenue in active periods, demonstrating financial prudence (e.g., $42,449 revenue vs. $33,868 expenses in 2014).
Spending Breakdown
How Wham Pta allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Wham Pta
Is Wham Pta a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Wham Pta (EIN: 202375583) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 2 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Wham Pta a good charity to donate to?
Wham Pta has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Wham Pta?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Wham Pta is 202375583. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Wham Pta spend its money?
Wham Pta allocates 90% to programs, 10% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Wham Pta's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Wham Pta's tax-exempt status using EIN 202375583 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Wham PTA appears to be a small, community-focused organization with fluctuating but generally positive financial health over the past three reported periods. In 2014, the organization reported revenue of $42,449 against expenses of $33,868, resulting in a surplus that increased its assets to $19,751. This indicates responsible financial management in that period. However, the latest filing shows $0 in revenue and assets, which could indicate a change in reporting status, a period of inactivity, or a significant decline, warranting further investigation.
The organization demonstrates strong spending efficiency, as evidenced by its consistent lack of officer compensation across all reported periods, suggesting that all funds are directed towards its mission rather than executive salaries. Without detailed expense breakdowns beyond total expenses, it's challenging to precisely assess program versus administrative spending. However, the absence of officer compensation is a positive indicator of efficient resource allocation.
Transparency is generally good given the available data, with consistent filings. The lack of detailed expense categories in the provided summary makes a granular assessment of spending transparency difficult. The sudden drop to $0 revenue and assets in the latest filing is a significant data point that impacts transparency and financial health assessment, as it's unclear if this represents a cessation of operations or a reporting anomaly.