Is Wildlife Media Legit?

Quick charity verification for Wildlife Media (EIN: 208802794)

Verdict: Wildlife Media appears trustworthy

85/100Mission Score
$1.0MRevenue
$1.3MAssets
2Red Flags
3Strengths

Red Flags

Strengths

Spending Breakdown

How Wildlife Media allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.

90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
5%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.

How to Interpret This Report

What Red Flags Mean

Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.

What Mission Score Measures

The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.

Using This Data for Donation Decisions

Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.

Frequently Asked Questions about Wildlife Media

Is Wildlife Media a legitimate charity?

Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Wildlife Media (EIN: 208802794) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 2 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.

Is Wildlife Media a good charity to donate to?

Wildlife Media has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $1.0M. Assets: $1.3M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.

What is the EIN for Wildlife Media?

The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Wildlife Media is 208802794. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.

What is a Mission Score?

The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.

How does Wildlife Media spend its money?

Wildlife Media allocates 90% to programs, 5% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.

How can I verify Wildlife Media's tax-exempt status?

You can verify Wildlife Media's tax-exempt status using EIN 208802794 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.

AI Transparency Report

Wildlife Media demonstrates consistent financial activity, with revenues fluctuating but generally showing growth over the past several years, culminating in a latest reported revenue of $343,117 for the period ending 202312. The organization consistently reports zero officer compensation across all available filings, which is a significant indicator of volunteer-led operations or a very lean executive structure. This practice, while potentially efficient, could also raise questions about the sustainability of leadership without compensation in the long term, though it certainly contributes to a higher percentage of funds available for programs. Spending efficiency appears strong, as evidenced by the consistent reporting of zero officer compensation. Without detailed breakdowns of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses in the provided data, a precise efficiency ratio cannot be calculated. However, the absence of executive compensation suggests a high dedication of resources to the mission. The organization's assets have varied, with recent filings showing $0 in assets and liabilities, which is unusual and may indicate a simplified reporting approach or a pass-through financial model. Further investigation into the detailed 990 forms would be necessary to fully understand the asset management and expense allocation. Transparency is generally good given the consistent filing history. The lack of reported assets and liabilities in recent years (2018-2023) is a notable point that warrants further scrutiny. While the zero officer compensation is transparently reported, the absence of other financial details like asset holdings could be a point of concern for some donors seeking a complete financial picture. Overall, the organization appears to be fiscally responsible in terms of executive costs, but more granular expense data would enhance the assessment of its operational efficiency and transparency.

View Full Transparency Report →

Disclaimer

AI-generated analysis based on IRS public records. Not financial or legal advice. Verify information directly with the organization.

Related Pages