Maintained positive assets and zero liabilities in prior active years, demonstrating fiscal responsibility.
Consistent IRS 990 filing history for several years, indicating compliance and transparency during its active period.
Spending Breakdown
How William Billy Juse Memorial Fund Inc allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
100%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
0%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about William Billy Juse Memorial Fund Inc
Is William Billy Juse Memorial Fund Inc a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, William Billy Juse Memorial Fund Inc (EIN: 20524778) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 65/100. 2 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is William Billy Juse Memorial Fund Inc a good charity to donate to?
William Billy Juse Memorial Fund Inc has a Mission Score of 65/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for William Billy Juse Memorial Fund Inc?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for William Billy Juse Memorial Fund Inc is 20524778. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does William Billy Juse Memorial Fund Inc spend its money?
William Billy Juse Memorial Fund Inc allocates 100% to programs, 0% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify William Billy Juse Memorial Fund Inc's tax-exempt status?
You can verify William Billy Juse Memorial Fund Inc's tax-exempt status using EIN 20524778 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The William Billy Juse Memorial Fund Inc appears to be a very small, volunteer-run organization based on its financial filings. With zero revenue and assets in its latest period, and very modest figures in prior years (e.g., $3,500 revenue in 2016), its operational capacity is extremely limited. The organization consistently reports no officer compensation, indicating a reliance on unpaid leadership, which is a positive sign for donor confidence regarding administrative overhead. However, the lack of detailed expense breakdowns in the provided data makes it difficult to fully assess spending efficiency beyond the overall low expense figures.
The organization's financial health, while stable in terms of asset retention over several years (e.g., assets grew from $20,123 in 2012 to $25,981 in 2016), is characterized by minimal activity. The most recent filing showing $0 revenue and assets suggests either dormancy or a significant change in operations. Without more detailed program information, it's challenging to determine the impact of its spending, though the consistent low expenses and zero liabilities are indicators of fiscal prudence for an organization of its size. Transparency is generally good given the consistent filings and zero officer compensation, but the absence of current financial activity raises questions about its ongoing operational status.