Latest filing shows $0 revenue and assets, indicating potential cessation of operations without clear explanation.
Significant decline in assets from $778,981 in 2011 to $0 in the latest period.
Strengths
Historically maintained a healthy asset base prior to the latest filing.
No reported officer compensation across all available filings, suggesting efficient use of funds at the leadership level if truly unpaid.
Spending Breakdown
How Wisconsin Environment Inc allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
75%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Wisconsin Environment Inc
Is Wisconsin Environment Inc a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Wisconsin Environment Inc (EIN: 208727611) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 40/100. 2 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is Wisconsin Environment Inc a good charity to donate to?
Wisconsin Environment Inc has a Mission Score of 40/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Wisconsin Environment Inc?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Wisconsin Environment Inc is 208727611. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Wisconsin Environment Inc spend its money?
Wisconsin Environment Inc allocates 75% to programs, 15% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Wisconsin Environment Inc's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Wisconsin Environment Inc's tax-exempt status using EIN 208727611 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Wisconsin Environment Inc. appears to be a small organization with a declining financial footprint. Their latest filing shows $0 in revenue and assets, which is a significant drop from previous years where revenue consistently exceeded $480,000. This abrupt change raises questions about the organization's current operational status and financial health. Historically, the organization has maintained a healthy asset base, peaking at $778,981 in 2011, but this has now completely diminished. The lack of any reported officer compensation across all available filings suggests either a fully volunteer-run leadership or that compensation is reported under different categories, which would require further investigation for full transparency.
Given the $0 revenue and assets in the latest period, it's difficult to assess current spending efficiency. However, in prior years, expenses were generally in line with or slightly below revenue, indicating a balanced operational approach. For instance, in 2014, expenses were $402,813 against $485,952 in revenue. The sudden cessation of financial activity is the most prominent feature of this organization's recent history, making it challenging to evaluate its ongoing financial health or program impact based solely on the provided data.
Transparency is a concern due to the sudden disappearance of financial activity without clear explanation in the provided data. While historical filings show consistent reporting, the latest $0 figures for revenue and assets, without context, could indicate dormancy, dissolution, or a significant restructuring not immediately apparent. The absence of officer compensation across all filings is a positive indicator for resource allocation, assuming leadership is genuinely unpaid or compensated through other means not captured here.