Is Womens Campaign Fund Legit?

Quick charity verification for Womens Campaign Fund (EIN: 203846776)

Verdict: Womens Campaign Fund shows mixed signals

65/100Mission Score
$197KRevenue
$29KAssets
4Red Flags
4Strengths

Red Flags

Strengths

Spending Breakdown

How Womens Campaign Fund allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.

75%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.

How to Interpret This Report

What Red Flags Mean

Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.

What Mission Score Measures

The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.

Using This Data for Donation Decisions

Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.

Frequently Asked Questions about Womens Campaign Fund

Is Womens Campaign Fund a legitimate charity?

Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Womens Campaign Fund (EIN: 203846776) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 65/100. 4 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.

Is Womens Campaign Fund a good charity to donate to?

Womens Campaign Fund has a Mission Score of 65/100. Revenue: $197K. Assets: $29K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.

What is the EIN for Womens Campaign Fund?

The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Womens Campaign Fund is 203846776. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.

What is a Mission Score?

The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.

How does Womens Campaign Fund spend its money?

Womens Campaign Fund allocates 75% to programs, 15% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.

How can I verify Womens Campaign Fund's tax-exempt status?

You can verify Womens Campaign Fund's tax-exempt status using EIN 203846776 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.

AI Transparency Report

The Womens Campaign Fund exhibits inconsistent financial health over the past decade. While the organization has periods of revenue exceeding expenses, such as in 2019 ($274,695 revenue vs. $262,564 expenses) and 2016 ($103,917 revenue vs. $32,234 expenses), it also frequently operates at a deficit, notably in 2020 where expenses ($249,918) significantly outstripped revenue ($143,222). This pattern suggests a fluctuating financial strategy or reliance on unpredictable funding cycles. The organization's assets have also varied considerably, from a high of $118,088 in 2011 to a low of $443 in 2015, indicating a lack of substantial reserves. Spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses, which is not provided in the summary data. However, the consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all filings suggests a commitment to minimizing overhead in that specific area. The organization's liabilities have often been substantial relative to its assets, raising concerns about long-term financial stability. For instance, in 2020, liabilities were $191,924 against assets of $42,373. In terms of transparency, the consistent filing of IRS Form 990s over a decade is a positive indicator. The absence of reported officer compensation is also a transparent disclosure. However, without more granular expense data, a complete picture of how funds are allocated to programs versus overhead remains somewhat opaque. The fluctuating financial performance and high liabilities in certain years warrant closer examination for potential donors.

View Full Transparency Report →

Disclaimer

AI-generated analysis based on IRS public records. Not financial or legal advice. Verify information directly with the organization.

Related Pages