How Wrg Foundation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
70%
Program Spending
Below average — room for improvement
20%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Wrg Foundation
Is Wrg Foundation a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Wrg Foundation (EIN: 133407905) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 65/100. 4 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Wrg Foundation a good charity to donate to?
Wrg Foundation has a Mission Score of 65/100. Revenue: $3.5M. Assets: $10.8M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Wrg Foundation?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Wrg Foundation is 133407905. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Wrg Foundation spend its money?
Wrg Foundation allocates 70% to programs, 20% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Wrg Foundation's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Wrg Foundation's tax-exempt status using EIN 133407905 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Wrg Foundation exhibits a fluctuating financial profile, with revenues varying significantly year-to-year, from a negative revenue of $-9,538 in 2015 to a high of $3,286,160 in 2014. Despite these fluctuations, the organization consistently maintains substantial assets, currently at $10,780,628, indicating a strong endowment or investment base. However, the foundation has frequently operated at a deficit, with expenses often exceeding revenue, such as in 2023 where expenses were $881,214 against revenues of $232,579, and in 2022 with $935,728 in expenses versus $13,511 in revenue. This suggests that the organization relies heavily on its existing assets or prior year surpluses to cover operational costs, rather than solely on annual contributions.
The consistent reporting of $1 in liabilities across multiple years (2012-2023) is unusual and could indicate a simplified accounting practice or a specific type of liability that remains constant. The absence of reported officer compensation across all filings is a notable aspect of its financial transparency, suggesting either a volunteer-led executive team or compensation being reported under other expense categories, which would warrant further investigation for complete transparency. Given the available data, a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses is not provided, making it challenging to fully assess spending efficiency. However, the consistent operational deficits raise questions about long-term financial sustainability if not adequately supported by asset growth or future revenue increases.