Quick charity verification for Zichron Avigdor Foundation (EIN: 200355779)
Verdict: Zichron Avigdor Foundation appears trustworthy
70/100Mission Score
$343KRevenue
$2.6MAssets
3Red Flags
3Strengths
Red Flags
Inconsistent annual revenue, with significant deficits in multiple years (e.g., 2023: $140,419 revenue vs. $203,841 expenses)
Zero reported officer compensation for an organization with over $2 million in assets, which could indicate reliance on unpaid leadership or compensation structured in a non-transparent manner.
Lack of detailed expense breakdown (program vs. admin vs. fundraising) in the provided summary data, limiting full assessment of spending efficiency.
Strengths
Strong and consistently growing asset base, increasing from $1,277,922 in 2011 to $2,392,076 in 2023, indicating robust financial stewardship.
Consistent reporting of zero officer compensation, suggesting a lean executive cost structure and potential for high volunteer engagement.
Spending Breakdown
How Zichron Avigdor Foundation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Zichron Avigdor Foundation
Is Zichron Avigdor Foundation a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Zichron Avigdor Foundation (EIN: 200355779) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 70/100. 3 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Zichron Avigdor Foundation a good charity to donate to?
Zichron Avigdor Foundation has a Mission Score of 70/100. Revenue: $343K. Assets: $2.6M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Zichron Avigdor Foundation?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Zichron Avigdor Foundation is 200355779. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Zichron Avigdor Foundation spend its money?
Zichron Avigdor Foundation allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Zichron Avigdor Foundation's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Zichron Avigdor Foundation's tax-exempt status using EIN 200355779 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Zichron Avigdor Foundation exhibits a fluctuating financial performance over the past decade, with revenues and expenses varying significantly year-to-year. For instance, in 2023, the organization reported revenue of $140,419 against expenses of $203,841, indicating a deficit. This trend of expenses exceeding revenue is also seen in 2022 and 2020. However, in other years like 2021 and 2019, revenue substantially outpaced expenses, suggesting an inconsistent operational funding model. The organization consistently maintains a healthy asset base, growing from $1,277,922 in 2011 to $2,392,076 in 2023, with minimal liabilities, indicating strong financial solvency and asset management.
The foundation's spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses, which is not provided in the summary data. However, the consistent reporting of zero officer compensation across all filings suggests a lean operational structure at the executive level, which can be a positive indicator of efficiency. The NTEE code T20 (Jewish Federations & Agencies) suggests a focus on community support, but without program expense details, the direct impact of spending on mission-related activities remains unclear. The consistent growth in assets despite revenue fluctuations points to effective long-term financial stewardship.
Transparency is generally good given the availability of 10 years of IRS 990 filings. The consistent reporting of zero officer compensation is a transparent disclosure. However, the lack of detailed expense breakdowns (program vs. admin vs. fundraising) in the provided summary data limits a deeper analysis of how funds are allocated to achieve the mission. Further scrutiny of the full 990 forms would be necessary to fully evaluate spending efficiency and program impact.