Consistent filing of IRS Form 990s during its operational period, demonstrating basic compliance.
Spending Breakdown
How Crescent Hill Academy allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Crescent Hill Academy
Is Crescent Hill Academy a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Crescent Hill Academy (EIN: 210679917) has notable concerns. Mission Score: 20/100. 3 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is Crescent Hill Academy a good charity to donate to?
Crescent Hill Academy has a Mission Score of 20/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Crescent Hill Academy?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Crescent Hill Academy is 210679917. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Crescent Hill Academy spend its money?
Crescent Hill Academy allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Crescent Hill Academy's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Crescent Hill Academy's tax-exempt status using EIN 210679917 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Crescent Hill Academy appears to be a defunct organization, as indicated by its latest revenue and asset figures of $0. This suggests it is no longer operational or has ceased filing. Historically, the organization demonstrated a pattern of operating at or near break-even, with expenses often slightly exceeding revenue in most reported periods, such as in 2017 where expenses were $1,044,509 against revenues of $1,029,956. This consistent near-deficit operation, coupled with the current $0 revenue and assets, raises significant concerns about its long-term financial viability during its active years and its current status.
Given the lack of detailed expense breakdowns (program, administrative, fundraising) in the provided data, a precise assessment of spending efficiency is not possible. However, the consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all filings suggests a potential strength in minimizing executive overhead, or it could indicate that executive roles were unpaid or compensated through other means not captured as officer compensation. The absence of current financial activity makes an assessment of ongoing transparency impossible, but the historical filings themselves demonstrate a basic level of compliance.