Significant deficit in the most recent fiscal year (202309), with expenses exceeding revenue by over $260,000.
Fluctuating revenue and asset levels, indicating potential financial instability.
Lack of detailed expense breakdown (program, admin, fundraising) in the provided data, hindering a full assessment of spending efficiency.
Strengths
Consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all filings, demonstrating a commitment to minimizing executive overhead.
Long and consistent filing history (13 filings), indicating compliance with IRS reporting requirements.
Demonstrated ability to generate significant revenue, exceeding $800,000 in 202109.
Spending Breakdown
How Greater Monadnock Collaborative allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
75%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Greater Monadnock Collaborative
Is Greater Monadnock Collaborative a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Greater Monadnock Collaborative (EIN: 20214564) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 70/100. 3 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Greater Monadnock Collaborative a good charity to donate to?
Greater Monadnock Collaborative has a Mission Score of 70/100. Revenue: $637K. Assets: $279K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Greater Monadnock Collaborative?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Greater Monadnock Collaborative is 20214564. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Greater Monadnock Collaborative spend its money?
Greater Monadnock Collaborative allocates 75% to programs, 15% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Greater Monadnock Collaborative's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Greater Monadnock Collaborative's tax-exempt status using EIN 20214564 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Greater Monadnock Collaborative demonstrates fluctuating financial health over the past several years. In the most recent filing (202309), the organization reported expenses exceeding revenue by a significant margin ($806,245 in expenses vs. $545,696 in revenue), leading to a net deficit. This contrasts with the prior year (202209) where revenue ($638,788) comfortably exceeded expenses ($485,355), indicating a surplus. The organization's assets have also seen considerable fluctuation, peaking at $626,314 in 202209 and dropping to $363,872 in 202309, suggesting potential instability in its financial reserves.
Spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses, which is not provided in the summary data. However, the consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all filings suggests a commitment to minimizing overhead in this specific area. The lack of detailed expense categorization in the provided data limits a comprehensive evaluation of how efficiently funds are allocated to its mission.
Regarding transparency, the organization has a robust filing history with 13 filings, indicating consistent compliance with IRS reporting requirements. The absence of reported officer compensation is a positive sign for transparency in executive pay. However, the 'Unknown' NTEE code and lack of detailed expense breakdowns in the provided data could be areas for improved transparency regarding its specific programmatic focus and operational spending.