How Max James Family Foundation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
20%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Max James Family Foundation
Is Max James Family Foundation a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Max James Family Foundation (EIN: 203401563) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 45/100. 4 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is Max James Family Foundation a good charity to donate to?
Max James Family Foundation has a Mission Score of 45/100. Revenue: $4K. Assets: $148. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Max James Family Foundation?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Max James Family Foundation is 203401563. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Max James Family Foundation spend its money?
Max James Family Foundation allocates 80% to programs, 20% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Max James Family Foundation's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Max James Family Foundation's tax-exempt status using EIN 203401563 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Max James Family Foundation appears to be a very small, family-run private foundation, as indicated by its NTEE code T22. Its financial activity is minimal, with the latest reported revenue at $3,750 and assets at $148. Over its filing history, revenue has fluctuated significantly, from a high of $34,700 in 2012 to a low of $750 in 2020. The organization consistently reports zero officer compensation, which is a positive indicator for a small foundation. However, the foundation has frequently reported expenses exceeding revenue, leading to negative net assets in some periods, such as -$1,520 in 2015. This suggests a reliance on prior year reserves or external support to cover operational costs.
The foundation's financial health is precarious given its small asset base and inconsistent revenue. While the lack of officer compensation is good, the overall scale of operations is extremely limited. The consistent reporting of liabilities, often exceeding assets, raises questions about its long-term financial stability. For example, in 2023, liabilities were $5,050 against assets of $93. The foundation's transparency is adequate for its size, as it files the required 990 forms, but the limited financial activity provides little insight into program effectiveness or spending efficiency beyond the basic numbers.