Is Missoula Institute For Sustainabletransportation Legit?
Quick charity verification for Missoula Institute For Sustainabletransportation (EIN: 205967694)
Verdict: Missoula Institute For Sustainabletransportation appears trustworthy
85/100Mission Score
$416KRevenue
$1.0MAssets
0Red Flags
5Strengths
No red flags identified.
Strengths
Consistent asset base over $1 million, indicating financial stability.
0% officer compensation reported across all filings, demonstrating high efficiency and dedication to mission.
Decreasing trend in liabilities from $1,196,340 in 2016 to $832,038 in 2023, showing improved financial management.
Consistent filing of IRS 990 forms over 8 periods, indicating transparency.
Revenue growth from $159,665 in 2018 to $416,493 in the latest period, suggesting increasing support.
Spending Breakdown
How Missoula Institute For Sustainabletransportation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
5%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Missoula Institute For Sustainabletransportation
Is Missoula Institute For Sustainabletransportation a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Missoula Institute For Sustainabletransportation (EIN: 205967694) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 0 red flags identified, 5 strengths noted.
Is Missoula Institute For Sustainabletransportation a good charity to donate to?
Missoula Institute For Sustainabletransportation has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $416K. Assets: $1.0M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Missoula Institute For Sustainabletransportation?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Missoula Institute For Sustainabletransportation is 205967694. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Missoula Institute For Sustainabletransportation spend its money?
Missoula Institute For Sustainabletransportation allocates 90% to programs, 5% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Missoula Institute For Sustainabletransportation's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Missoula Institute For Sustainabletransportation's tax-exempt status using EIN 205967694 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Missoula Institute For Sustainabletransportation demonstrates consistent financial activity, with revenues fluctuating but generally showing growth over the past several years, reaching $416,493 in the latest period. The organization maintains a healthy asset base, consistently over $1 million, which provides a strong financial cushion. A notable aspect is the reported 0% officer compensation across all available filings, indicating a volunteer-led or very lean executive structure, which positively impacts spending efficiency by directing more funds to programs rather than administrative overhead. The organization's liabilities have shown a decreasing trend in recent years, from $1,196,340 in 2016 to $832,038 in 2023, suggesting improved financial management and reduced reliance on debt.
While specific program spending percentages are not provided in the raw data, the absence of officer compensation strongly suggests a high proportion of expenses are directed towards its mission. The organization's consistent filing of IRS 990 forms over eight periods indicates a commitment to transparency. However, without a detailed breakdown of expenses (program, administrative, fundraising), a precise assessment of spending efficiency is limited. The organization's NTEE code W40 (Transportation & Logistics) aligns with its mission, and its consistent operation and asset base suggest a stable, albeit modestly sized, operation.
Overall, the Missoula Institute For Sustainabletransportation appears to be a financially stable and transparent organization, particularly commendable for its lack of executive compensation. Its consistent asset base and decreasing liabilities are positive indicators. Further detailed expense breakdowns would enhance the understanding of its spending efficiency.