Lack of detailed expense breakdown (program, admin, fundraising) in the provided data, hindering efficiency assessment.
Strengths
Consistent revenue growth, from $6.2 million in 2015 to $9.7 million in 2023, indicating financial stability.
Positive net income (revenue exceeding expenses) in all reported periods, demonstrating sound financial management.
Steady asset growth, from $12.1 million in 2015 to $15 million in 2023, strengthening the organization's financial position.
Spending Breakdown
How Woodlands Club allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
75%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Woodlands Club
Is Woodlands Club a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Woodlands Club (EIN: 10414169) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 65/100. 2 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Woodlands Club a good charity to donate to?
Woodlands Club has a Mission Score of 65/100. Revenue: $14.0M. Assets: $19.6M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Woodlands Club?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Woodlands Club is 10414169. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Woodlands Club spend its money?
Woodlands Club allocates 75% to programs, 15% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Woodlands Club's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Woodlands Club's tax-exempt status using EIN 10414169 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Woodlands Club demonstrates consistent financial growth and stability over the past decade. Revenue has steadily increased from $6.2 million in 2015 to $9.7 million in 2023, with assets growing from $12.1 million to $15 million in the same period. The organization consistently operates with a surplus, as evidenced by revenues exceeding expenses in all reported periods. For instance, in 2023, revenue was $9,741,979 against expenses of $9,282,907, indicating sound financial management and an ability to build reserves. The absence of reported officer compensation across all filings suggests a potential lack of transparency regarding executive pay, or that compensation is structured in a way not captured under 'officer compensation' on the 990, which warrants further investigation for a complete financial picture.
While the financial health appears robust with growing assets and consistent surpluses, the lack of detailed spending breakdown (program, administrative, fundraising) in the provided data makes it challenging to fully assess spending efficiency. The organization's liabilities have also shown an upward trend, from $5.6 million in 2015 to $5.4 million in 2023, which, while not alarming given asset growth, is a factor to monitor. Without specific program spending data, it's difficult to ascertain the direct impact of its expenditures on its stated mission, which is crucial for a comprehensive efficiency assessment.
Transparency is a concern due to the consistent reporting of 0% for officer compensation. While this could indicate a volunteer-led executive team, it is unusual for an organization with nearly $10 million in annual revenue and $15 million in assets. This lack of reported compensation could obscure how leadership is compensated, impacting the overall transparency score. Further details on how the organization allocates its expenses between program services, administration, and fundraising would significantly enhance its transparency and allow for a more precise evaluation of its operational efficiency.